 |
 |

Four Recent Health Reform InitiativesImplications for Pediatric Health Reform
John D. Lantos, MD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(10):912-914.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
A central feature of health care financing in the United States is that we spend far more per capita on health care than any other country. We nevertheless leave millions of citizens uninsured. Critics on the political left and right offer different solutions, none of which have garnered sufficient support to lead to structural change. Our curious, uniquely inegalitarian system seems to represent the least unacceptable compromise we can develop among deeply conflicting cultural and political values.
One value conflict that plays out repeatedly in debates about child health care focuses on the need to define and separate the "deserving poor" or the "truly needy" from the "free riders" who might take advantage of government-sponsored health care even though they do not really need it. The effort to separate these groups adds expensive layers of bureaucratic complexity, nonproductive administrative costs, and duplicative systems of care.
In . . . [Full Text of this Article] THE NATIONAL VACCINE INITIATIVE OF 1993
THE CREATION OF SCHIP
EXPANSION OF FEDERALLY QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTERS
SCHIP EXPANSION PROPOSALS IN 2007
PUBLIC PROGRAMS, PRIVATE PROGRAMS, AND "CROWD OUT"
CAN WE BUILD A JUST 2-TIERED SYSTEM?
AUTHOR INFORMATION
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
This Month in Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(10):910.
FULL TEXT
|