This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on ISI (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship  • Medical Ethics  • Pediatrics, Other  • Randomized Controlled Trial  • Alert me on articles by topic

The Ethics of Nonpublication of Research Studies

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:1014-1015.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The article by Hartling et al¹ in this issue of the ARCHIVES joins a growing number of studies identifying the underlying reasons for publication bias. As with other studies, what is demonstrated here is that the root cause of nonpublication lies with the investigator, not with the editor or the work itself.^2-6 More than 1 in 4 of the randomized controlled trials reviewed were not published, and, of those, a surprisingly low 17% were actually ever submitted for publication. On the surface, this newest study seems to be a commentary on the busy lives of physician researchers: research does not get published simply because there is not enough time. Additionally (and sadly), work does not get published because of difficulties with co-investigators. As discussed by the authors, one of the problems with nonpublication is the potential impact on clinical decision making. Clinical decisions based only on the published literature . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION

M. Denise Dowd, MD, MPH

RELATED ARTICLE

Factors Influencing the Publication of Randomized Controlled Trials in Child Health Research
Lisa Hartling, William R. Craig, Kelly Russell, Kelly Stevens, and Terry P. Klassen
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(10):983-987.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT