You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 163 No. 4, April 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •eTable
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Adolescent Medicine
 •Exercise
 •Obesity
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Diet
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Dutch Obesity Intervention in Teenagers

Effectiveness of a School-Based Program on Body Composition and Behavior

Amika S. Singh, PhD; Marijke J. M. Chin A Paw, PhD; Johannes Brug, PhD; Willem van Mechelen, MD, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(4):309-317.

Objective  To determine whether a multicomponent health promotion intervention for Dutch adolescents (defined as persons between 12 and 14 years of age) would be successful in influencing body composition and dietary and physical activity behavior in both the short and long terms.

Design  Randomized controlled trial.

Setting  Ten intervention and 8 control prevocational secondary schools.

Participants  A total of 1108 adolescents (mean age, 12.7 years).

Intervention  An interdisciplinary program with an adapted curriculum for 11 lessons in biology and physical education and environmental change options.

Main Outcome Measures  Body height and weight, waist circumference, 4 skinfold thickness measurements, and dietary and physical activity behavior data.

Results  Multilevel analyses showed that the intervention remained effective in preventing unfavorable increases in important measures of body composition after 20-month follow-up in girls (biceps skinfold and sum of 4 skinfolds) and boys (triceps, biceps, and subscapular skinfolds). Consumption of sugar-containing beverages was significantly lower in intervention schools both after intervention (boys: –287 mL/d; 95% confidence interval [CI], –527 to –47; girls: –249; –400 to –98) and at 12-month follow-up (boys: –233; –371 to –95; girls: –271; –390 to –153). For boys, screen-viewing behavior was significantly lower in the intervention group after 20 months (–25 min/d; 95% CI, –50 to –0.3). No significant intervention effects on consumption of snacks or active commuting to school were found.

Conclusion  The Dutch Obesity Intervention in Teenagers program resulted in beneficial effects on the sum of skinfold thickness measurements in girls and consumption of sugar-containing beverages in both boys and girls in both the short and long terms.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Public and Occupational Health (Drs Singh, Chin A Paw, and van Mechelen), VU University Medical Center, EMGO Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Drs Brug, Singh, Chin A Paw, and van Mechelen).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

This Month in Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(4):295.
FULL TEXT  

School-Based Interventions: Where Do We Go Next?
Leslie A. Lytle
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(4):388-389.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Poorer Health: The Persistent and Protean Connections Between Poverty, Social Inequality, and Child Well-being
Feudtner and Noonan
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009;163:668-670.
FULL TEXT  

School-Based Interventions: Where Do We Go Next?
Lytle
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009;163:388-389.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.