You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 1, January 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Ethics
 •Oncology
 •Oncology, Other
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Asthma
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Allergy
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Children's and Their Parents' Views on Facing Research Risks for the Benefit of Others

David Wendler, PhD; Tammara Jenkins, MSN

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(1):9-14.

Objective  To assess children's and parents' attitudes regarding pediatric research that poses minimal risk or a minor increase over minimal risk and does not offer the potential to benefit the child clinically.

Design  Separate in-person interviews with children and their parents.

Setting  Clinics where the children were receiving clinical care or participating in clinical research for asthma or cancer.

Participants  Children aged 7 to 14 years and their parents or legal guardians.

Intervention  In-person interviews.

Main Outcome Measures  Respondents' willingness to enroll the child in nonbeneficial research and charitable activities that posed the same risks.

Results  Overall, 81 child-parent pairs were interviewed. For a hypothetical study that would not benefit the child and posed a risk of headache, 71% of the children were willing to participate, and 72% of the parents would allow their children to participate. For a hypothetical study that would not benefit the child and posed a very small chance of a broken leg, 43% of the children and 24% of the parents endorsed the child's participation. Overall, respondents were equally willing to have the child help others by participating in nonbeneficial research or by participating in a charitable activity.

Conclusions  Most respondents were willing to have the child participate in some nonbeneficial research, and most did not consider nonbeneficial pediatric research to be more problematic than charitable activities for children. These findings provide empirical data to support the acceptability of exposing children to some research risks for the benefit of others.


Author Affiliations: Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (Dr Wendler), and Pediatric Critical Care and Rehabilitation Research Program, National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Ms Jenkins), Bethesda, Maryland.


RELATED ARTICLE

Empirical Data and the Acceptability of Research Risk: A Commentary on the Charitable Participation Standard
William W. Reynolds and Robert M. Nelson
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(1):88-90.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Stroke Genetic Research and Adults With Impaired Decision-Making Capacity: A Survey of IRB and Investigator Practices
Chen et al.
Stroke 2008;39:2732-2735.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Empirical Data and the Acceptability of Research Risk: A Commentary on the Charitable Participation Standard
Reynolds and Nelson
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008;162:88-90.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.