You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 4, April 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Child Development
 •Psychiatry
 •Autism
 •Screening
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Parental Compliance After Screening Social Development in Toddlers

Claudine Dietz, MSc; Sophie H. N. Swinkels, PhD; Emma van Daalen, MD; Herman van Engeland, MD, PhD; Jan K. Buitelaar, MD, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(4):363-368.

Objectives  To examine the prevalence of parents' compliance with follow-up measurements after their child tested positive at a screening to assess problems in social development, as well as to find demographic, screening-related, and child-specific factors associated with parental compliance.

Design  Two-stage screening design.

Setting  Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Participants  A random population of 31 724 children were screened at well-baby clinics at age 14 to 15 months (screen 1). Three hundred sixty-four children underwent screen 2 (255 children who scored positive at screen 1 [population screening] and 109 children younger than 36 months who were identified by surveillance because of suspected problems in their social development).

Main Exposure  A 2-stage screening was applied.

Main Outcome Measures  Compliance with recommendations of having either a second screening (after screen 1) or clinical evaluation (after screen 2).

Results  Of 370 children who tested positive at screen 1, parents of 255 children (69%) complied with screen 2. Three groups were distinguished after screen 2 (n = 173): early compliance (clinical evaluation within 6 months) (68%), late compliance (clinical evaluation after 6 months) (14%), and noncompliance (no clinical evaluation) (18%). Late compliance and noncompliance were more common in parents of younger children and children who were identified via population screening. Parents of children with either relatively high cognitive skills and/or low scores on screening measures were less inclined to comply.

Conclusions  Study results suggest higher effectiveness of surveillance over population screening. Screening may well be applied as a second step after surveillance to identify children who need further clinical evaluation.


Author Affiliations: Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Ms Dietz and Drs van Daalen and van Engeland); and Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, and Karakter Child and Adolescent Psychiatry University Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (Drs Swinkels and Buitelaar).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Looking Ahead to Even More Discoveries in Autism Spectrum Disorder While Addressing Current Needs
Schonfeld and Manning-Courtney
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:412-413.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.