You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 9, September 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Adolescent Medicine
 •Substance Abuse/ Alcoholism
 •Alert me on articles by topic


Long-term Effects of Universal Preventive Interventions on Methamphetamine Use Among Adolescents

Richard L. Spoth, PhD; Scott Clair, PhD; Chungyeol Shin, PhD; Cleve Redmond, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:876-882.

Objective  To examine the long-term effects of universal preventive interventions on methamphetamine use by adolescents in the general population during their late high school years.

Design  Two randomized, controlled prevention trials.

Setting  Public schools in the Midwest from 1993 to 2004.

Participants  Study 1 began with 667 sixth grade students from 33 rural public schools; the follow-up included 457 students. Study 2 began with 679 seventh grade students from 36 rural public schools; the follow-up assessment included 597 students.

Interventions  In study 1, schools were assigned to the Iowa Strengthening Families Program (ISFP), Preparing for the Drug Free Years, or a control condition. In study 2, schools were assigned to a revised ISFP (SFP 10-14) plus Life Skills Training (SPF 10-14 + LST), LST alone, or a control condition.

Results  Self-reports of lifetime and past-year methamphetamine use were collected at 61/2 years past baseline (study 1) and at 41/2 and 51/2 years past baseline (study 2). In study 1, the ISFP past-year rate was 0.0% compared with 3.2% in the control condition (P = .04). In study 2, SFP 10-14 + LST showed significant effects on lifetime and past-year use at the 41/2 year follow-up (eg, 0.5% lifetime use in the intervention condition vs 5.2% in the control condition, P = .006); both SFP 10-14 + LST and LST alone had significant lifetime use effects at the 51/2 year follow-up.

Conclusion  Brief universal interventions have potential for public health impact by reducing methamphetamine use among adolescents.


Author Affiliations: Partnerships in Prevention Science Institute, Iowa State University, Ames.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cultural Adaptation Process for International Dissemination of the Strengthening Families Program
Kumpfer et al.
Eval Health Prof 2008;31:226-239.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.