You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 11, November 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Viral Infections
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Efficacy of Duct Tape vs Placebo in the Treatment of Verruca Vulgaris (Warts) in Primary School Children

Marloes de Haen, MD; Marcus G. Spigt, PhD; Caro J. T. van Uden, PhD; Pierre van Neer, MD; Frans J. M. Feron, MD; André Knottnerus, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:1121-1125.

Objective  To determine the efficacy of duct tape compared with placebo in the treatment of verruca vulgaris.

Design and Setting  A randomized placebo-controlled trial in 3 primary schools in Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Participants  One hundred three children aged 4 to 12 years with verruca vulgaris.

Interventions  Duct tape applied to the wart or placebo, a corn pad (protection ring for clavi), applied around the wart for 1 night a week. Both treatments were applied for a period of 6 weeks. Patients were blinded to the hypothesis of the study.

Main Outcome Measurement  Complete resolution of the treated wart.

Results  After 6 weeks, the wart had disappeared in 16% of the children in the duct tape group compared with 6% in the placebo group (P = .12). The estimated effect of duct tape compared with placebo on diameter reduction of the treated wart was 1.0 mm (P = .02, 95% confidence interval, –1.7 to –0.1). After 6 weeks, in 7 children (21%) in the duct tape group, a surrounding wart had disappeared compared with 9 children (27%) in the placebo group (P = .79). Fifteen percent of the children in the duct tape group reported adverse effects such as erythema, eczema, and wounds compared with 0 in the placebo group (P = .14).

Conclusion  In a 6-week trial, duct tape had a modest but nonsignificant effect on wart resolution and diameter reduction when compared with placebo in a cohort of primary school children.


Author Affiliations: Departments of General Practice (Drs de Haen, Spigt, and Knottnerus) and Dermatology (Dr van Neer), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Integrated Care, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht (Dr van Uden); and Youth Health Care Division, Regional Public Health Institute, Maastricht (Dr Feron).


RELATED LETTER

Studies Should Report Estimates of Treatment Effects With Confidence Intervals
Peter Cummings
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(5):518-519.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Interpreting Negative Results From an Underpowered Clinical Trial: Warts and All
Jeanne Van Cleave, Alex R. Kemper, and Matthew M. Davis
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160(11):1126-1129.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Studies Should Report Estimates of Treatment Effects With Confidence Intervals
Cummings
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:518-519.
FULL TEXT  

Duct tape ineffective in treating warts
Kemp
AAP News 2007;28:2-2.
FULL TEXT  

Interpreting negative results from an underpowered clinical trial: warts and all.
Van Cleave et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160:1126-1129.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.