You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 4, April 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Improving the Readability and Processability of a Pediatric Informed Consent Document

Effects on Parents’ Understanding

Alan R. Tait, PhD; Terri Voepel-Lewis, MSN, RN; Shobha Malviya, MD; Sandra J. Philipson, MA, CAGS

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:347-352.

Objective  To examine whether a consent document modified to conform with the federal guidelines for readability and processability would result in greater parental understanding compared with a standard form.

Design  Randomized clinical study.

Setting  The preoperative waiting area of a larger tertiary care children’s hospital.

Participants  A total of 305 parents of children scheduled for minor elective surgical procedures.

Interventions  Parents were randomized to receive information about a clinical study in 1 of 4 ways: (1) standard consent form alone, (2) standard consent form with verbal disclosure, (3) modified form alone (standard form modified to meet the federal guidelines for readability and processability), and (4) modified form with verbal disclosure.

Main Outcome Measures  Parents were interviewed to determine their understanding of 11 elements of consent, including study purpose, protocol, risks, benefits to child (direct), benefit to others (indirect), freedom to withdraw, alternatives, duration of study, voluntariness, confidentiality, and whom to contact. Their responses were scored by 2 independent assessors.

Results  Understanding of the protocol, study duration, risks, and direct benefits, together with overall understanding, was greater among parents who received the modified form (P<.001). Additionally, parents reported that the modified form had greater clarity (P = .009) and improved layout compared with the standard form (P<.001). When parents were shown both forms, 81.2% preferred the modified version.

Conclusions  Results suggest that a consent form written according to federal guidelines for readability and processability can improve parent understanding and thus will be important in enhancing the informed consent process.


Author Affiliations: Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor.


RELATED ARTICLE

Moving Beyond the Consent Document in Research on Informed Consent
Victoria A. Miller and Robert M. Nelson
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(4):396-397.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pain in children: recent advances and ongoing challenges
Walker
Br J Anaesth 2008;101:101-110.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethical Challenges in Cancer Research in Children
Berg
The Oncologist 2007;12:1336-1343.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Presenting Research Information to Children: A Tale of Two Methods
Tait et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2007;105:358-364.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Moving Beyond the Consent Document in Research on Informed Consent
Miller and Nelson
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:396-397.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.