 |
 |

Glycemic Patterns Detected by Continuous Subcutaneous Glucose Sensing in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Treated by Multiple Daily Injections vs Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion
Naomi Weintrob, MD;
Amir Schechter, MA;
Hadassa Benzaquen, CDE;
Shlomit Shalitin, MD;
Pearl Lilos, BSc;
Avinoam Galatzer, MA;
Moshe Phillip, MD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:677-684.
Objective To compare glycemic patterns by mode of therapy in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus using the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS).
Design Open randomized crossover comparing 3 months of multiple daily injections (MDI) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).
Setting Tertiary care, university-affiliated medical center.
Patients Twenty-three children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Interventions The CGMS was applied for 72 hours after 1 month and at the end of each study arm.
Main Outcome Measures Hemoglobin A1c levels and glucose level profiles were compared between the 2 study arms and the 2 sensor applications for each arm.
Results The arms were similar for mean (SD) hemoglobin A1c levels (CSII, 8.0% [0.8%]; and MDI, 8.2% [0.8%]) and glucose levels. Areas under the curve were significantly larger during MDI for nocturnal and 24-hour hypoglycemia (P = .01 and .04, respectively) and for postprandial hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia (P = .03 and .05, respectively). The rate of hyperglycemia increased during CSII (P = .03), but 24-hour duration and area under the curve for hyperglycemia were similar. Compared with the first CGMS reading in each arm, the second had a longer mean duration of postprandial within-target glucose levels (P = .04), tendency for lower rate of diurnal hypoglycemic events (P = .1), shorter duration of nocturnal hypoglycemia (P = .05), and smaller 24-hour area under the curve for hypoglycemia (P = .04).
Conclusions Intensive treatment with CSII seemed to be associated with slightly better prebreakfast, postprandial, and within-target glucose profiles than MDI, as well as a smaller area under the curve for hypoglycemia. Lower hypoglycemia-related variables in the second sensor reading in each arm indicate that the CGMS may serve as an educational tool to decrease the rate and magnitude of hypoglycemia.
From the Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center of Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tiqva (Drs Weintrob, Shalitin, and Phillip, Mss Benzaquen and Lilos, and Mr Galatzer), Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel (Drs Weintrob, Shalitin, and Phillip), and Abramson Center for Medical Physics, School of Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv (Mr Schechter).
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Use of Insulin Pump Therapy in the Pediatric Age-Group: Consensus statement from the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology, the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society, and the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes, endorsed by the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes
Phillip et al.
Diabetes Care 2007;30:1653-1662.
FULL TEXT
Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Measure the Frequency of Low Glucose Values When Using Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Compared With Biphasic Human Insulin 30: A double-blind crossover study in individuals with type 2 diabetes
McNally et al.
Diabetes Care 2007;30:1044-1048.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Improved Glycemic Control in Poorly Controlled Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring
Deiss et al.
Diabetes Care 2006;29:2730-2732.
FULL TEXT
Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Guided Insulin Adjustment in Children and Adolescents on Near-Physiological Insulin Regimens: A randomized controlled trial
Yates et al.
Diabetes Care 2006;29:1512-1517.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Insulin pump therapy in youth with type 1 diabetes: a retrospective paired study.
Nimri et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:2126-2131.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy
Klonoff
Diabetes Care 2005;28:1231-1239.
FULL TEXT
|