You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 8, August 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •HIV/AIDS
 •Medical Ethics
 •Pregnancy and Breast Feeding
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic

When Parents Reject Interventions to Reduce Postnatal Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission

Leslie E. Wolf, JD, MPH; Bernard Lo, MD; Karen P. Beckerman, MD; Alejandro Dorenbaum, MD; Sarah J. Kilpatrick, MD, PhD; Peggy S. Weintrub, MD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:927-933.

In a recent Oregon case, the state successfully sued for custody of an infant to prevent his human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–infected mother from breastfeeding him and to require antiretroviral prophylaxis. As more HIV-infected women give birth, pediatricians may increasingly face dilemmas when parents reject medical recommendations to forgo breastfeeding and to administer antiretroviral prophylaxis to the infant. Such disagreements create ethical dilemmas because pediatricians have an obligation to both protect the infant and respect parental decision making. Pediatricians need to balance these obligations in deciding whether to ask the courts to intervene on the infant's behalf. To that end, we analyze the legal and ethical issues that arise when an HIV-infected mother refuses interventions to reduce neonatal transmission of HIV to her infant, provide an approach for addressing these disagreements, and present illustrative scenarios in which pediatricians should, may, and should not seek a court order to intervene.


From the Program in Medical Ethics, the Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, the Division of General Internal Medicine (Ms Wolf and Dr Lo), Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences (Dr Beckerman), and Department of Pediatrics (Drs Dorenbaum and Weintrub), University of California, San Francisco; and Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois at Chicago (Dr Kilpatrick).

Corresponding author and reprints: Leslie E. Wolf, JD, MPH, Program in Medical Ethics, University of California, San Francisco, 521 Parnassus Ave, Suite C-126, San Francisco, CA 94143-0903 (e-mail: lwolf{at}medicine.ucsf.edu).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Court-Mediated Disputes Between Physicians and Families Over the Medical Care of Children
Ridgway
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;158:891-896.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical Neglect: A Child-Focused View
Dubowitz et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:297-298.
FULL TEXT  

Exposure to Possible Risk Is Unethical
Murray
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:87-87.
FULL TEXT  

The Choice by HIV-Positive Women to Exclusively Breastfeed Should Be Supported
Greiner et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:87-88.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.