You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 8, August 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Pediatric Length of Stay Guidelines and Routine Practice

The Case of Milliman and Robertson

Jeffrey S. Harman, PhD; Kelly J. Kelleher, MD, MPH

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:885-890.

Background  Guidelines for inpatient length of stay (LOS) have been developed by Milliman and Robertson (M&R) and are widely applied by health plans. This study was designed to compare LOS for several pediatric conditions with the M&R LOS criteria using recent data and to determine if concordance of actual practice with M&R LOS criteria varied between children and adults.

Design  Administrative data from Pennsylvania hospitals from 1996 through 1998 were used to examine LOS for hospital discharges for 12 selected diagnoses for which M&R published guidelines for children and adults.

Patients  Discharge data for all patients discharged from public and private hospitals in Pennsylvania for which 1 of 12 selected diagnoses were examined.

Main Outcome Measure  Length of stay.

Results  In Pennsylvania hospitals from 1996 through 1998, pediatric LOS was divergent for all conditions examined, although not to the extent found in a previous study examining data from New York State. Of note, median LOS for some conditions was shorter than M&R LOS criteria. The percentage of pediatric hospital discharges that exceeded the M&R LOS criteria ranged from 25% for pneumonia to 84% for meningitis. Adult hospital discharges exceeded M&R LOS criteria to a greater extent than did pediatric discharges for all conditions except for sickle cell crisis and meningitis.

Conclusions  The M&R LOS criteria were divergent from routine practice for both children and adults. Greater divergence of adult discharges illustrates the need to consider comorbid conditions when implementing these guidelines. Thus, patient care may suffer if guidelines are implemented in an uninformed way. These findings emphasize the importance of using the best possible science when producing guidelines such as these.


From the Child Services Research and Development Program, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Corresponding author and reprints: Jeffrey S. Harman, PhD, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3811 O'Hara St, Suite 430, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (e-mail: harmanjs{at}msx.upmc.edu).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

How Valid Are Length-of-Stay Guidelines?
JWatch Psychiatry 2001;2001:16-16.
FULL TEXT  

How Valid Are Length-of-Stay Guidelines?
JWatch General 2001;2001:8-8.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.