You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 144 No. 3, March 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Immunity to Measles in a Large Population of Varying Age

Significance With Respect to Vaccination

Herbert Braunstein, MD; Susan Thomas, MT (ASCP); Ray Ito, MT (ASCP)

Am J Dis Child. 1990;144(3):296-298.


Abstract

• During a measles outbreak, 660 hospital employees of widely varying ages were screened for immunity to the disease using an automated indirect fluorescent antibody technique. Of these 660 employees, 623 indicated their year of birth; 21 were seronegative and 13 had borderline titers. Of those born before 1957, 7 tested seronegative and 6 were borderline, while 12 of those born between 1959 and 1964 were seronegative and 3 were borderline. There are several possible reasons for these findings. It is concluded that mass immunization of high-risk populations during outbreaks, while effective, is difficult to justify scientifically because only a small percentage of subjects are not immune. If facilities permit, mass screening during outbreaks may be feasible. Preferably, continuous screening and vaccination of susceptible high-risk employees could be performed. Our study also does not validate exclusion from immunization programs those born prior to 1957 in view of the fact that both seronegativity and disease occur in this age group with significant frequency.

(AJDC. 1990;144:296-298)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Laboratories, San Bernardino (Calif) County Medical Center.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication October 20, 1989.

Reprint requests to Department of Laboratories, San Bernardino County Medical Center, San Bernardino, CA 92404 (Dr Braunstein).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Screening Hospital Employees for Measles Immunity Is More Cost Effective than Blind Immunization
Sellick et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1992;116:982-984.
ABSTRACT  

Should All Children Receive Two Measles Vaccinations?: A Study of Measles Susceptibility in a Suburban New Jersey Private Practice
Tesoro et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 1992;31:194-199.
ABSTRACT  

ADULT REIMMUNIZATION AGAINST MEASLES
JWatch General 1990;1990:4-4.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.